Responsibility and Cyclists

Bike Law Ann on earning respect.
My social media feed is pretty much full with cycling news and race reports. So for the past several days, I’ve seen a lot of news and commentary on two cycling news events: (1) the Kentucky cyclist convicted of riding in the travel lane of a busy thoroughfare and (2) the New York cyclist colliding with, and critically injuring, a pedestrian in Central Park.
First let me say that it is difficult to get a full picture of anything from news reports. I’ve handled cases reported in the news. When I’ve read the story in the paper the next day about what happened in court, I sometimes barely recognize it as the same case. I’m not familiar with Jessamine County Kentucky and I have not ridden a bike there. I’m somewhat familiar with Central Park but I haven’t hired a crash reconstructionist to delve into the details of this event. So my opinions on these events are based on the possibly inaccurate version of events portrayed in the media.
That said, I think there is a theme which we can discuss intelligently in the context of both events: Responsibility.
Regarding the Kentucky cyclist, I have not yet heard an argument that would support her conviction. I’m not a Kentucky lawyer, or expert on Kentucky bike law. If I were to apply North Carolina law, however, her conviction should be overturned. Our law allows cyclists to ride on any road other than a fully restricted access highway or interstate; cyclists may use the full lane and the law does not prohibit cyclists from “impeding” traffic. Thank goodness.
The government in the Kentucky case has argued that the bicyclist was driving recklessly because she was causing cars to veer around her, thereby posing a danger to other traffic. This position is obviously motorist-centric; drivers have a duty to anticipate whatever may be in the road in front of them, whether it’s a vehicle turning into a driveway, someone switching lanes or slower moving traffic, like bicycles. If they cannot, they are driving too fast or following too closely.
The more holistic question, however, leaves me pondering. I’m not saying there’s another side. There may not be. Highway 27 in Jessamine County may be the safest, quickest route for this cyclist to take getting from A and B, and I support her right to take it. But with rights come responsibilities. I wonder whether the Kentucky road is similar to Capital Boulevard in Raleigh, or parts of South Boulevard or maybe Billy Graham Parkway in Charlotte. I know I would not likely choose any of these North Carolina roads for an extended distance during rush hour. Why would I? There are better roads that offer less interaction with cars and a much more pleasant ride. If I’m going to take a busy road, is it because it’s the best way for me to get to my destination, or is it just so I can assert my right to do so? If the latter, there are better, and more responsible, ways to fight this battle.
Regarding the New York tragedy, on the very foremost front of our responsibilities is the responsibility to ride safely and not cause injuries to others who are more vulnerable. We rightly demand this from motor vehicle drivers. We regularly pose the question to drivers: so you think I’m doing something stupid….and you’re going to kill me over it? Pedestrians should pay attention to where they are walking and they should obey the rules. On bicycles, we are much faster moving, and therefore, a much greater force, than a pedestrian. If we see a pedestrian not following the rules, it is our responsibility as a human being to try to avoid hitting them, even if they’re in our right of way. The failure of the New York cyclist to do caused a human tragedy and has many New Yorkers demanding strict restrictions on cyclists in the City.
As six time Olympic champion Chris Hoy tells other cyclists, “If you want respect you have to earn it.” There are battles that should be fought and rights we should demand. Let’s be sure to choose them wisely.

North Carolina lawyer and Bike Law founder, Ann Groninger, has advocated at the state level on behalf of bicyclists in North Carolina for over 15 years. Ann has offices in Charlotte and Durham and has helped bike accident clients in Asheville, Raleigh, Durham, Greenville, Wilmington, Fayetteville, and throughout the state. Read more about Ann on her bio page.
-
From Winner to Advocate: One Cyclist’s E-Bike Journey
Two years ago, on a family trip to Switzerland, my wife and I rented two electric-assisted mountain bikes, or e-MTBs, to tackle some steep trails near the Matterhorn. The salesperson said, in no uncertain terms, that the new e-MTBs were the way of the future, and we should give them a try. So we did. …
-
A Comprehensive Guide to E-Bikes in Louisiana: Laws, Tips, and Choosing the Best E-Bike
E-bikes are popping up everywhere. If you’re riding one in Louisiana or thinking about getting one, you may have questions about the laws, safety tips, and how to pick the right bike. That’s exactly what this post is here for! We’ll break down what you need to know about riding e-bikes in Louisiana, from legal…
-
The Lisa Torry Smith Act: A Win for Cycling Safety in Texas?
The Lisa Torry Smith Act brings important changes to Texas law. It makes clear that cyclists can ride in crosswalks and now requires drivers to stop and yield before entering a crosswalk with a pedestrian or cyclist. A gap in Texas law is allowing some drivers who hit people in crosswalks to get off scot-free,…
-
Far Right?! I was taking a LEFT!
Even Bike Law lawyers get hassled. Like many of us, riding for me is stress relief; it’s an escape from conflict and a busy schedule. Sometimes incidents on the road have the opposite effect and one incident this weekend made me question the state of humanity. It was not an unusual event, nor a particularly…
-
E-BIKES ARE LEGAL IN NC (WELL, SOME OF THEM)
Love them or hate them, e-bikes continue to rise in popularity. At the same time, lawmakers struggle to keep up with the developing technologies. Every week I get multiple inquiries from people trying to navigate North Carolina’s e-bike laws. If you’re confused, you’re not alone. We could easily fill a book with all the latest…
-
BIKES & CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Many of our cycling clients find themselves having to interact with the criminal justice system. Typically, it’s because the driver who hits them (or their family member) is charged with a crime or traffic offense. Occasionally bicyclists themselves are charged with traffic offenses! Every state’s criminal laws are different, but there is a lot of…
-
Another Successful Road Defect Case, This Time a $750,000 Settlement in Georgia
We recently shared the story of a trial victory from the State of Texas where a bicyclist was injured due to a defect in a road maintained by the Texas Department of Transportation. Texas Road Defect We now can tell the story of another huge win in a road defect case, this time from our Bike Law…
-
One Million Dollars for Texas Road Defect
The Texas Department of Transportation had offered cyclist Mike Bagg $0. Recently, attorneys with the Bike Law network took a case to a trial against a titan of a defendant: the Texas Department of Transportation. TxDOT was represented by the Attorney General’s Office, one of Texas’ largest legal teams. We had a great client, but it was…
-
More Roads = Better Transportation, And Other Myths
2023 got off to a rough start for Charlotte, North Carolina, particularly in the context of road safety. Within about a week, we lost a young woman who was riding her bicycle, a pedestrian killed in the same area of town, and four people were killed in a car wreck on I-85 in the University…










