Call

Blog

Law
02

Blog

Letter to the Press

It's Crash, Not the A-Word.

CLICK HERE FOR .PDF OF THE LETTER.

[CLICK AGAIN ON THE .PDF AFTER JUMP FOR DOWNLOADABLE VERSION]

To all members of the media and Associated Press:

Crash fatalities amongst cyclists and pedestrians are at a 30 year high with more than 2 people on bikes being killed every day and pedestrians at an alarming rate of every :90 minutes. That means that in places where these members of our communities aren’t completely invisible, you have been busier than you have been in 3 decades reporting on the deaths of those who choose and/or rely on human-powered transportation. I believe that you have a duty to do so with both factual accuracy and humanity. Those two things can co-exist, even in crash reporting.

  1. The A word: In 2016, the Associated Press released guidelines warning those reporting on traffic incidents against using the word “accident.” The harm done when you identify crashes involving motorists and cyclists/pedestrians is a symptom of the assumption you make when you misrepresent a collision or crash as an unavoidable event, or act of God, alleviating drivers of culpability and their legal duty to operate their motor vehicles in a way that does not cause injury and death. Crashes are the product of human error. While many, if not most, don’t occur with intent, it is important to understand that intent is not synonymous with harm.
  2. Helmet usage: Victim blaming is a social and cultural phenomenon that requires complete and nuanced understanding to be eradicated. You have the power to shift this dynamic and affect social (and legal) change with a few minor adjustments. If you would not mention the length of a rape victim’s skirt, why would you ever mention whether or not a cyclist who was hit by a motorist was wearing a helmet? What role do plastic and styrofoam play in the circumstances or causation of a crash? Rarely, if at all, do I read about whether the driver involved in a collision with a vulnerable road user was wearing their seat belt. Perhaps that’s because there is little to no risk of injury or death to the motorist whereas those things are guaranteed for cyclists and pedestrians. Maybe it’s because that would be absurd.
  3. Driver responsibility: “Gray Honda Civic(s),” “Blue Dodge Caravan(s),” and “Fed-Ex box trucks,” unless autonomous, require human operation. Please make drivers culpable. When motorists take human life using their vehicles as weapons, it’s not only inaccurate but incredibly offensive to read that mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters are taken from their loved ones by inanimate multi-ton boxes of steel. The make and model of the involved vehicle is not the responsible party. You would not report on gun violence by solely identifying the type of firearm used to kill. The deceased are worthy of greater respect from you; in the least, they are worthy of the same you give to drivers who are responsible for their deaths. Considering the inability for a deceased cyclist or pedestrian to provide their recitation of the crash that ended their life, lop-sided reports that mention “ driver cooperation” with law enforcement after a crash are yet another way the value of our lives is trivialized by you, the media.

You are not responsible for the uptick in hit and runs, the Distracted Driving epidemic (which is the number one cause of death amongst American teens), or the lack of safe, scalable, effective inclusive infrastructure available to people who choose multi-modal transportation. But you are responsible for the way you act as conduits of important information for your readers. The world is moving on; law enforcement, advocates, educators, policy makers, lawyers, cyclists, and pedestrians all seem to have a better grasp on the importance of words. We know they matter. My challenge and heartfelt plea to you is to consider how factual reporting means removing personal bias and assumptions in the context of the interactions between motorists and our bike/ped community members.

I believe that you, on a fundamental human level, are fully capable of understanding why this is so important and how you can use your power for good while capturing what is actually happening and improving the quality of your work product. 

If you have questions or would like to discuss this further, I welcome an open and productive dialogue with the hopes that the several tens of millions of people in this country that choose human powered transportation can find a much needed ally in you. 

After all, it’s life and death.

Respectfully,

S/Rachael Maney

Comments

E Bike Law
Charlie Thomas Jan 10, 2025

What is an E-bike? An electric bike, or e-bike, is a bicycle equipped with a motor and rechargeable battery that provides pedal assistance. It’s designed to amplify your pedaling power, offering adjustable levels of support to make cycling easier—whether you’re tackling headwinds, covering longer distances, or just looking for a more comfortable ride.  E-bikes are […]

Read More
Charlie Thomas Nov 08, 2024

A gap in Texas law is allowing some drivers who hit people in crosswalks to get off scot-free, despite recently passed legislation meant to address the issue. It’s called the Lisa Torry Smith Act and was passed in 2021. This law requires drivers to “stop and yield” to pedestrians, bicyclists, and anyone else legally using […]

Read More
Bike lawyer rides her bike in Charlotte, NC
Ann Groninger Jun 21, 2024

Bike Law lawyer hassled by a driver for riding in the lane. Why, because she was trying to take a left turn!

Read More
E-BIKE LAWS. ARE THEY LEGAL?
Ann Groninger Apr 04, 2024

Love them or hate them, e-bikes continue to rise in popularity. At the same time, lawmakers struggle to keep up with the developing technologies. Every week I get multiple inquiries from people trying to navigate North Carolina’s e-bike laws. If you’re confused, you’re not alone.  We could easily fill a book with all the latest […]

Read More
Ann Groninger Jan 04, 2024

Many of our cycling clients find themselves having to interact with the criminal justice system. Typically, it’s because the driver who hits them (or their family member) is charged with a crime or traffic offense. Occasionally bicyclists themselves are charged with traffic offenses! Every state’s criminal laws are different, but there is a lot of […]

Read More
Bike Crash Road Defect Georgia
Peter Wilborn Jun 14, 2023

We recently shared the story of a trial victory from the State of Texas where a bicyclist was injured due to a defect in a road maintained by the Texas Department of Transportation. Texas Road Defect   We now can tell the story of another huge win in a road defect case, this time from […]

Read More
Road defect dangerous to cyclists
Charlie Thomas Mar 14, 2023

Recently, attorneys with the Bike Law network took a case to a trial against a titan of a defendant: the Texas Department of Transportation. TxDOT was represented by the Attorney General’s Office, one of Texas’ largest legal teams. We had a great client, but it was a tough case to prove. So tough, in fact, […]

Read More
bike path charlotte
Ann Groninger Jan 13, 2023

  2023 got off to a rough start for Charlotte, North Carolina, particularly in the context of road safety. Within about a week, we lost a young woman who was riding her bicycle, a pedestrian killed in the same area of town, and four people were killed in a car wreck on I-85 in the […]

Read More
North Carolina Bike Crash
Ann Groninger Dec 06, 2022

Unless you’re a very recent follower of ours, you’ve heard us talk before about “contributory negligence.” To recap: “pure contributory negligence” is the law in North Carolina and only 3 other states (Alabama, Virginia, Maryland). In pure contributory negligence states, if a person is injured by someone else’s fault and the injured person contributes even […]

Read More
Load More